Probably most important of all, the European rules include various amendments that make the requirements of CRR 2CRD V more proportionate to the size and complexity of institutions, as not to be disproportionally costlier for very small banks (which also are subject to the regulation in the EU) compared to the larger institutions that can benefit from the economies of scale.As the BCBS is not a supranational or sovereign authority, the prudential rules it proposes are not intrinsically legally binding.It introduced more rigorous rules regarding capital adequacy, stress testing, and liquidity risk.
However, as Basel III is not a legal requirement, it needs to be translated to the legal systems of any given country. CRD IVCRR The Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV) and Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), published in June 2013, are jointly implementing the Basel III agreement to the EU legislation. As a regulation, CRR is the first instance of the implementation of the Basel standards directly on EU level; This reflects an effort to create a single set of rules for all jurisdictions, a single rulebook. Differences between Basel III and CRD IVCRR CRD IVCRR are not exactly carbon copies of Basel III; some leeway had to be made to avoid conflict with European and member states law. Some differences however are more than just formal or cosmetic; the CRD IV encompasses some additional elements: Remuneration practices, setting the ratio of variable (or bonus) component of remuneration to the fixed component (or salary) to the maximum of 100, in exceptional cases 200; Corporate governance arrangements and processes; Measures to increase the effectivity of the risk oversight by boards, particularly by increasing diversity therein; Increasing transparency with regards to profits, taxes and subsidies in different jurisdictions. In the European environment, this transparency is essential, given the large loss of public trust towards the financial sector; Reduced reliance on external credit ratings. Basel III applies to internationally active banks only, but EU makes a habit of applying the same set of rules to all banks and credit institutions (as was already done with the transposition of Basel 2 agreement). The treatment of all banks as internationally active is necessary given the openness of the single European Market. However, EU firms concerned with investment advice or executing brokerage services, which do not hold client money, are not covered by CRD IV. There are ways in which CRD IVCRR are more lenient than Basel III as not to worsen the persistent under-investment within the EU. In December 2014 the prudential regulatory framework in the EU was evaluated to be materially non-compliant with the minimum Basel III standards. The assessment conceded that the EU framework is in several areas more rigorous than the Basel framework, yet the overall grade was sealed by deviations regarding the Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach for credit risk and the counterparty credit risk component. A number of new sets of rules were released by the Basel committee in order to patch Basel III whenever something was lacking, though the scope and focus of some of them (FRTB in particular) make them brand new regulations in their own rights. These patches include: New standards regarding the counterparty risk and the CCPs (in July 2012); Specification of rules for liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) requirement and specification of the requirement on capital, that would be based on leverage ratio (in January 2013). Because European Regulators implemented Basel III as late as June 2013, the abovementioned rules are already incorporated in the CRD IVCRR; the following BCBS proposals were published later and thus are yet to be implemented in EU legislation: Revisions to the Standardised Approach for counterparty risk (in March 2014); Net stable funding ratio, ensuring that banks have a stable funding profile in relation to their on- and off-balance sheet activities (in October 2014); Fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB) - a revised market risk capital framework (in January 2016). Revisions to the Standardised Approach for credit risk (in March 2016); The new standard on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) that reflects changes in market and supervisory practices due to the current exceptionally low interest rates (in April 2016). To further see the timeline of Basel III, its amendments and its incorporation in the EU, please consult the timeline below. Implementation in the European Environment The Commission made a bid to incorporate all of the above to the EU law in November 2016 by proposing Amended CRR and CRD IV (also referred to as CRR 2 and CRD V) as well as BRDSRM. These adjustments are limited in scope or are temporary until lending increases to the desirable level. Some of the adjustments are to prevent a potential unfavourable treatment of the areas that are particularly important to cross-border trade.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2021
Categories |